Nov 09

I have Google alerts set up for a wide range of subjects, but one of the main is Bartitsu. This wonderful Edwardian Martial Art is passion of mine, and I look after another blog on it, on behalf of the Bartitsu Society. Via this alert I today came across this article focusing, as many do, on one of the wackier more unusual part of the art - self defence with a bicycle.

Peter Robins, the journalist of the piece recounts a time he was assaulted whilst riding his bike and 2 things leap out from his account.

It happened late at night. I was cycling slowly up a steepish hill. I passed a shell-suited gentleman - he on the pavement, me on the road - and he mumbled something. I asked him to repeat it, thinking it might be “You’ve got a puncture.” His response was to do nothing for about 15 seconds, then sprint around in front of me, shout at me, and punch me in the mouth.

What was right for me, I discovered, was to wait, stunned, for a couple of seconds until he started to walk away, and then carry on cycling while using my tongue to check whether any of my teeth had come loose. Perhaps if I had studied Bartitsu I might have been able to scare the man away. Or perhaps I would have been empowered to do something really stupid.

The most obvious is the failure in awareness and decision making that lead to a mine on a bike being overtaken by a man on foot and assaulted. The second is the more telling. He wanted to scare the man away. Scare him.

Not defend himself, not fight back. Scare him away.

What Mr Robins seems to want is to be able to protect himself without having to really do anything. To have a magic technique of waving his bike pump like a wand and ‘Muggerio Runawayio’, have him run off with his tail between his legs like a villain from a Harry Potter novel. Sadly this is just not possible. The guy who attacked Mr Robins picked him for a reason. He selected him as the target of his rage because he recognised someone who would not fight back. Someone he could hit without anything happening to him. A clever trick with a bike pump will not change that correct assessment. Some sensible, realistic training would.

Such training would show Mr Robins that the something stupid was not fighting back, as he seems to suggest, but rather the stopping for 15 seconds whilst a thug worked himself up to hit him. It was stopping for a chat with a dodgy stranger on a deserted road at night. With effective training, a reasonable level of fitness (certainly an experienced cyclist would be fit enough) and the right mental attitude fighting back would have been an option, as would the decision making to avoid having to do so. Sadly his incredulous response to this advice would indicate having anything like the willingness to defend himself against attack is a long way off.

If you are accosted, stand firm. Co-operating with a mugger is never going to help. What if they wave a knife under your nose? Well… any idea of what a bicycle pump can do to an eye or throat?

Of course, giving up ones bike, phone or wallet is a far better option than having to get physical, if that option does not seem open to you than I would suggest using a bike pump in such a way would be an excellent idea.

written by La Bete \\ tags: , , , , , , , ,

Jun 26

According to Guido, the Spectator today has this little tale from Tory speechwriter Danny Kruger

My wife and I were coming out of a house in Camden where we had been viewing a flat to rent. Standing on the steps with us, the owner of the flat suddenly saw the retreating rear of his moped, two boys aboard and half a dozen of their friends pelting along behind.

Like the pair of prats we were, the owner and I tackled youth crime. When we caught up with the pedestrians, we received between us a black eye (owner) and cut lip (me), and no moped.

My main memory of this incident is rather horrid: the spit-filled mouth of the little rat-faced boy who punched me. Short, white, in a grey hooded tracksuit, he shouted at me with all the rage of Cain: the most astonishing indignation.

Whilst it is a shame that he got hurt, his experience does provide a lesson. Dealing with physical aggression is hard. It is not nice, but sometimes it is required. Some prior thought, either about for what it is worth risking his life, and some planning and practice in dealing with these kind of situations. I’m not saying not to go chasing thieves, although I wonder how many of us would, considering the question dispassionately, risk our lives for a moped belonging to a stranger? It may be that you would, but the time to first consider that decision is not when it happens. Consider now your limits. Visualise the situation and think - is this something that is worth not going for?. If not then be prepared to resist that impulse to jump in. If it is, then jump with a clear mind, free of the burden of this particular decision. Dealing with a feral hoody is not a good time to have that voice in your back of your head saying ‘I wish I had just stepped back’.

The concept of making decisions prior to having to implement them is central to strategy, and especially to Boyd’s OODA Loop concept. It also has the advantage of removing some of the negative thoughts that can rob one of resolve. Both of which I shall discuss in later posts.

written by La Bete \\ tags: , , , , ,

May 09

The key to self defense is to walk softly and carry a
powerful tool.

So says Rob on the WorthProtectionSecurity blog. He could not be more wrong.

Don’t get me wrong, Rob has products to sell and a living to make, and he makes it from helping people feel safe. This a noble enterprise. However, the myth propagated here is that all you need is the right tool, the right technique and you will be safe. Buy the pepper spray, learn the chin-jab or buy the taser and you are safe as houses. 

Let’s think about this for a moment. A weapon, any weapon is a force multiplier. It takes your existing will to stop someone and increases the likelihood that will happen. A weapon is a tool, a piece of kit. It is not a solution. As Dennis Martin teaches: Strategy > Tactics > Technique > Kit. In the same way that it is the decision and method of cleaning that stops you getting food poisoning, not the super duper new kitchen spray; a weapon will not make up for walking around with your head up your arse or making bad decisions. Likewise a weapon is useless without the skill, or the will to use it. Start spraying pepper spray inside and you will likely end up just as hurt as any attacker. Wave a baton without knowing how, where and when to hit and you may as well not bother.

By all means get a weapon, where legal. Get many. I think that would be a Good Thing. Just get the skills and strategic understanding first. It is those, not the tool that will keep you safe. Awareness, good decision making backed up by simple, effective physical techniques. This is where the value lies. Without these a tool is of decidedly limited value.

written by La Bete \\ tags: , , ,