<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omnifocus vs. Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/</link>
	<description>The personal website of James Marwood. I talk about Self Defence, Libertarianism, Atheism, Politics and Cooking.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Bete</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-3675</link>
		<dc:creator>La Bete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-3675</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I&#039;ll get it finished and posted up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;ll get it finished and posted up <img src='http://www.safeism.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve searched the archives in vain for the article promised in the last sentence.  Sure would like to see that article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve searched the archives in vain for the article promised in the last sentence.  Sure would like to see that article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Bete</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>La Bete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>There does seem to be a dearth of apps for Windows. It&#039;s a shame as I am sure the demand is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There does seem to be a dearth of apps for Windows. It&#8217;s a shame as I am sure the demand is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonathan Zarkovian</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonathan Zarkovian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>Too bad they both have no Windows version. I still have tt find a GTD app for the iTouch+Windows that has a dependencies feature (I hear Omnifocus has it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad they both have no Windows version. I still have tt find a GTD app for the iTouch+Windows that has a dependencies feature (I hear Omnifocus has it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Bete</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>La Bete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

Thanks for posting. That&#039;s a valid point, and the tag window does make things a little easier. However I dislike having to switch from keyboard to mouse, and back again if I can avoid it and the Things tagging just didn&#039;t work for me.

It certainly is easy to use, and I understand why it is as popular as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting. That&#8217;s a valid point, and the tag window does make things a little easier. However I dislike having to switch from keyboard to mouse, and back again if I can avoid it and the Things tagging just didn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
<p>It certainly is easy to use, and I understand why it is as popular as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Y</title>
		<link>http://www.safeism.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/omnifocus-vs-things/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.safeism.com/blog/?p=294#comment-665</guid>
		<description>I too ported my projects from Omnifocus to Things the other week. Rather than enter the tags by hand for each to-do, you can assign tags by opening the tag window and dragging the appropriate tags on top of a to-do. You can also drag one or more to-dos onto a tag in the tag window to accomplish the same thing.

There are definitely some 1.0 problems w/ Things, and I wish it had a &#039;view all&#039; and subprojects, but for me its ease of use trumps OF&#039;s thoroughness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too ported my projects from Omnifocus to Things the other week. Rather than enter the tags by hand for each to-do, you can assign tags by opening the tag window and dragging the appropriate tags on top of a to-do. You can also drag one or more to-dos onto a tag in the tag window to accomplish the same thing.</p>
<p>There are definitely some 1.0 problems w/ Things, and I wish it had a &#8216;view all&#8217; and subprojects, but for me its ease of use trumps OF&#8217;s thoroughness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
